《我母亲的消失》是一部激进的纪录片，日日它诞生于一个渴望解放自己的母亲和一个渴望利用电影媒介与她保持亲密关系的儿子之间的一系列对抗之中。从个人为控制而进行的激烈斗争开始，日日它就转变成一个深度协作的项目，一个试图纠正几十年来由相机压抑的目光造成的伤害的项目。Benedetta Barzini是一位受人尊敬的意大利模特，她通过成为一名记者和教授打破了陈规陋习，并通过公开批评时尚界根深蒂固的厌恶情绪而臭名昭著。但是现在，在她70多岁的时候，巴兹尼对图像世界的厌恶已经加深到一个存在主义的危机中。她悄悄地、毫无预兆地收拾好行李，告诉儿子贝尼阿米诺，她打算永远从物质世界消失。贝尼阿米诺惊恐万状，设计了一个计划，他希望允许她面对-而不是逃跑-她最不信任的东西：相机。通过拍摄她的电影，他打算挽救他母亲的真实本质，并保存她的叙事。
回复 :明代故事：已故太原守备之女陈秀英与母开茶馆为生，其父留一铁弓，遗言能开弓者即以女许婚。太原总镇史须龙之子欲娶秀英，被陈母痛打而逃。陈母造之，遇史部将匡忠解劝，约回茶馆。秀英钟情于匡， 匡又能开弓，二人比武成婚。史须龙父子合谋命匡父子解钩，暗地却买通关白劫伪。匡父子因失伪发配云南。史子又去逼秀英，秀英假意允婚，将其杀死J母女同逃，投匡友王富则。不料， 富刚正来访匡，被史家丁拿获，王督抚知其冤，赦之。秀英乔扮男子， 冒富刚名，路上遇关白之女翠娥，许婚。秀英假约三事后、成礼，代掌兵权。起兵攻太原，杀史须龙报仇。王督抚令富刚出战，真假富刚交战无胜负，王又调回匡父子， 匡与秀英相见，夫妻团圆。一名《英杰烈》、《豪杰店》。《开茶馆》一折有时单独演出。荀慧生代表作。
回复 :玛侬（艾曼纽·贝阿 Emmanuelle Béart 饰）是一个游荡于山林之中的牧羊女，在她温婉美丽的外表下，隐藏了一段悲惨的往事。玛侬的父亲死于一场阴谋，而罪魁祸首正是帕比特（伊夫·蒙当 Yves Montand 饰）和格林特（丹尼尔·奥图 Daniel Auteuil 饰）叔侄二人。一次偶然中，格林特看见了正在沐浴的玛侬，不知真相的他深深的为玛侬的美貌而着迷，但此时，玛侬早已和教师贝莱德（西波里特·吉拉多特 Hippolyte Girardot 饰）两情相悦了。玛侬逐渐得知了父亲死亡的真相，愤怒的她将仇恨埋藏在心底，期望着雪耻的一天到来。在玛侬的设计下，她在所有村民面前解开了帕比特和格林特伪善的面具，格林特羞愧而死。但是，悲剧并没有就此结束。
回复 :Volker Schlöndorff transposes Bertolt Brecht’s late-expressionist work to latter-day 1969. Poet and anarchist Baal lives in an attic and reads his poems to cab drivers. At first feted and later rejected by bourgeois society, Baal roams through forests and along motorways, greedy for schnapps, cigarettes, women and men: ‘You have to let out the beast, let him out into the sunlight.’ After impregnating a young actress he soon comes to regard her as a millstone round his neck. He stabs a friend to death and dies alone. ‘You are useless, mangy and wild, you beast, you crawl through the lowest boughs of the tree.’The film takes youthful impetuousness and hatred of oppression as its subject and also ponders the cult of genius and sexual morals. Rainer Werner Fassbinder simultaneously plays both Baal and himself and is surrounded by many actors who were later to perform in his own films. After the film was broadcast on West German television, Brecht’s widow Helene Weigel prohibited any further screenings, arguing that the social circumstances engendering Baal’s rebelliousness had not been adequately explained.
