本剧描述了现代都市一白领典型（某网络公司CEO）边雅，小明因母亲丢失爱犬（可乐）后，小明在帮助母亲寻找爱犬的过程之中，所引发的个人和家庭情感以及社会责任感等一系列的问题。在寻找爱犬的过程中，边雅发现，因忙于自己的事业，忽略了退休一个人在家的母亲的情感需求，边雅原以为能通过帮助母亲找到爱犬就能解决母亲问题，也因此母亲不会影响到自己的事业。但是在找犬的过程之中才发现，母亲所需要的不仅仅是她的爱犬，而是需要人与人之间的亲情关怀。影片的最后，虽然边雅和母亲以及帮助她们寻找爱犬的同事和邻里没有找回丢失的爱犬，但是她们找回了彼此曾经丢失的情感世界以及社会责任感的归属；而过程之中，边雅无意中发现，网络上一条寻狗启事的贴子，得到了社会极大的呼应，因此边雅他们知道了社会上人与人之间真正的需求所在。
回复 :凯奇饰演前神枪手演科尔顿·布里格斯，现在经营着一家杂货店，和家人一起平静地生活。当一帮歹徒残忍地杀害了他的妻子，布里格斯回到家，发现他的世界在燃烧。他掏出手枪，和一个意想不到的人——他12岁的女儿组队一起寻求复仇。
回复 :青年向坂伸行（玉森裕太 饰）在浏览网页的时候误打误撞的点开了一个名为“雨树之国”的博客，就此结识了博客的管理者瞳（西内玛利亚 饰），巧合的是，瞳不仅和向坂年岁相仿，而且生活在同一个城市。就这样，两人开始了邮件的往来，一来二去之中感情急速升温。向坂十分想在现实里见一见这位志同道合的好友，可是瞳却犹豫了，因为她有一个秘密——瞳患有感音性耳聋。经不住向坂的软磨硬泡，怀着忐忑的心情，瞳和向坂终于见面了。然而，这两人的初次约会并不完美，瞳种种怪异的举动让向坂感到非常的烦躁，最终，忍不住脾气的他向瞳发火了，瞳这才露出了耳朵上佩戴的助听器。
干乐队
回复 :Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.
