大导演严俊又一警世之作，希崎根据蒲松龄《聊斋志异》同名故事改编，希崎描述明末期间，才女连琐（李菁）因救父而误杀奸徒，复投井自尽。十多年后，才子杨于畏（李丽华）因逃避奸臣追捕，投奔父执世交唐尚书（井淼）；怎料唐尚书趋炎附势，拒不收留，幸得老仆李贵（顾文宗）忠义，引于畏于一荒废书馆躲藏。于畏夜间无意与连琐相会，夕夕相对，发生一段人鬼之恋。唐尚书义女连闱（李菁分饰）与连琐原属同胞姊妹，跟于畏早有婚约。连闱妒恨亡姊迷惑于畏，指挥仆役火焚书馆，不料失足而死；连琐得借妹屍还魂，与于畏终成眷属。此片由天皇巨星李丽华反串男主角，而「亚洲影后」李菁分饰连琐及连闱两姊妹，一正一邪，一人一鬼，表现出众。
回复 :靠骗取游客钱财为生的印度街头小混混阿贾，一直努力攒钱想带母亲去巴黎，可惜母亲没能等到这一天便去世了。于是，身上只有100欧元的阿贾带着母亲的骨灰踏上巴黎穷游之旅。为了省去住宿费阿贾藏在宜家的衣柜里，不料阴差阳错被运到英国，而后辗转流落到西班牙、意大利、利比亚……一段精彩非凡的冒险之旅由此展开。
东海
回复 :本片描述了抗日战争时期，衡水湖渔民四水和未婚妻水杏等配合八路军在湖区诸岛与日本兵、汉奸斗智斗勇、艰难周旋、誓死捍卫民族利益和国家大义的悲壮故事……
回复 :Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
